Jeremiah 31:31-34; Psalm
119:9-16
Hebrews
5:5-10; John
12:20-33
How many of you went to see “The Hunger Games” this weekend?
How many of you read the book?
How many of you know what I am talking about?
I have to admit that the most I know about “The Hunger
Games” came from the reviews of the movie in Friday’s newspapers. The story
takes place in, as the New York Times calls it, a “picturesque dystopia.” Every
year in this post-post-United States North America, a set of teenagers is
chosen to fight to the death – and to have these games televised – until one
hero or heroine survives. This plot device is a direct steal from the Roman
Empire, from the custom of “bread and circuses.” The name of the empire in “The
Hunger Games” is even “Panem,” the Latin word for bread.
This formula [of bread and circuses, historians tell us] offered
a variety of pleasures such as: the distribution of food, public baths,
gladiators, exotic animals, chariot races, sports competition, and theater
representation. It was an efficient instrument in the hands of the Emperors to
keep the population peaceful, and at the same time giving them the opportunity
to voice themselves in these places of performance. … [1]
The emperors and their minions organized the games, and the
gladiators were the peoples of the lands conquered by the Empire:
German, Spanish, Welsh, Britannic, black Africans, nomadic
Russians, and Jews from Jerusalem. … using the defeated enemy to entertain the
public was a triumph in victory.[2]
I think this is indeed what “The Hunger Games” is based on:
a central, imperial power using brute force to divide and conquer subjected
people.
If we read the Gospels closely, we will see that this
reality of empire, this ever-present reality of brute force, of violence, of
subjugation, is the foreground of the gospels. The story of Jesus takes place
in the face of this empire, of its fear, of its force. It is the social context
in which the Jews, and Jesus, lived. It is the air they breathe, the water they
drink, the bread they consume.
If you think about it, we Christians cannot really
understand why the Romans had Jesus executed. He was such a nice person, who
said such nice things. It is hard to get back into that space, where the
surrounding world was so brutal, and what Jesus said and did was in such
enormous contrast. What was going on, 2000+ years ago?
One historian who has helped me make sense of this context
of Jesus ministry is John Dominic Crossan. “Most of the world works on a greed
system,” he says.
Keep that in mind. On a big scale, we like to keep ours and
take lots of other peoples’ things. So empires usually run on that principle
and on the premise that they own the world. The Roman emperors had not the
slightest doubt that they were in charge of the entire world … if I were to
attach a motto to the Roman Empire, I would say, “First victory, then peace.”
It’s the program the world’s been run on for about 5,000 years.
What was so shocking to some, and so thrilling to others, in
the first century, was that Jesus proclaimed a very different kind of empire, a
different kingdom ruled by a different king. Instead of vanquishing your
enemies in the “hunger games,” where death is the final answer, Jesus says, ”unless
a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain;
but if it dies, it bears much fruit. Those who love their life lose it, and
those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life.” The
standard for Jesus, and for the kingdom of this God is not victory but service;
not smashing one’s enemies but justice. Crossan puts it this way:
Jesus’ program is: “First justice, then peace.” That’s the
real thing. Otherwise, you have peace for a while, but then eventually wars
break out, and you start all over again.
Jesus’ message was thrilling to some, and threatening to
others, because he challenged the “victory” status quo. Peace in the kingdom of
heaven came when people realized there was enough to go around, when there was
justice, when God worked in a collaborative way. Peace came to Caesar’s empire
only after the enemies were vanquished, and forced to “entertain” in the arena
of bread and circuses. It became a never-ending cycle of violence and vanquish:
there was always someone rising up who did not want to be conquered.
John Dominic Crossan, quoted in an interview in "Zion's Herald" -- http://www.zionsherald.org/interviewJuly05.html
No comments:
Post a Comment